Religious Test In Asylum Case Ruled Improper

January 23, 2011 § Leave a comment

A Chinese Christian should be given another chance at asylum after an immigration judge thought the man couldn’t answer “basic questions” about Christianity, a federal appeals court has ruled. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that Lei Li was improperly denied asylum after the judge was unsatisfied by his answers on whether Thanksgiving is a Christian holiday and the difference between the Old and New Testaments. Lei became a Christian in 1999 and was subsequently beaten, interrogated by Chinese authorities and lost his job after hosting church services in his house. He arrived in the U.S. on a tourist visa in 2001. In 2005, two years after he applied for asylum, an immigration judge ruled that Lei “failed to demonstrate credible evidence that he is a Christian” and made conflicting statements about his residency. The appeals court ruled that Lei “is in good company” in thinking that Thanksgiving is a Christian holiday, noting that George Washington and Abraham Lincoln cited God in their Thanksgiving proclamations. (huff post)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Religious Test In Asylum Case Ruled Improper at Harlan York and Associates Immigration Lawyer Team 973.642.1111.

meta

%d bloggers like this: